논문 (학술지)
무릎 골관절염에 대한 고주파 절제술과 관절 내 중간엽 줄기세포 주사의 비교: 체계적 문헌 고찰 및 네트워크 메타분석
등록번호 | - | SCI 구분
?
※구분 : SCI(SCIE포함), 비SCI |
SCI |
---|---|---|---|
저자명 (주·공동저자) | 박석희 ※ 과제 참여정보와 일치하는 연구자 상세정보로 정확하지 않을 수 있습니다. |
||
논문구분 | 국외전문학술지 | 학술지명 | Reg Anesth Pain Med |
ISSN | 1098-7339 | 학술지 출판일자 | 2024-05-24 |
학술지 볼륨번호 | n(n) | 논문페이지 | 0 ~ 0 |
학술지 임팩트팩터 | 5.1 | 기여율 | 100 % |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105526 | ||
초록 | BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative disease and causes disability, pain and imposes a substantial burden on patients. Conventional treatments for knee OA show limited effectiveness. Consequently, innovative treatments, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and intra-articular mesenchymal stem cells (IA MSC), have gained attention for addressing these limitations. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy of RFA and IA MSC for knee OA through a network meta-analysis (NMA). EVIDENCE REVIEW: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and handsearching. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RFA or IA MSC to conventional treatments for knee OA were included. The primary outcomes comprised the pain score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach, and the treatments were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. FINDINGS: We included 34 RCTs (n=2371). Our NMA revealed that RFA and IA MSC were significantly more effective than conventional treatments in managing pain at both 3 and 6?months with moderate certainty. Specifically, RFA demonstrated the highest SUCRA values, indicating its superior efficacy. For WOMAC scores, both RFA and MSC showed significant improvements at 3?months, with RFA maintaining its lead at 6?months, although MSC did not display significant superiority at this stage. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that RFA and MSC are resilient treatment options in knee OA. Despite some study heterogeneity, these treatments consistently outperformed conventional treatments, particularly in the short to mid-term, although with varying levels of certainty in their efficacy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023492299. |
연구개발성과 등록 또는 활용에 대한 문의는 논문 연구개발성과 담당자를 통해 문의하시기 바랍니다.
[문의] 한국과학기술정보연구원 Tel : 042)716-7066, https://curation.kisti.re.kr/
- NTIS 관련 이용문의는 NTIS 콜센터(042-869-1115)로 문의하시기 바랍니다.
NTIS의 논문 정보는 국가연구개발사업 수행을 통해 발생된 성과로, 조사분석 등을 통해 입력된 정보를 수집 및 제공하고 있어, 출판사 또는 논문 정보 제공 사이트(Scienceon, RISS 등)에서 일괄 제공하는 논문 정보와 차이가 있을 수 있습니다.